Who Is Supposed to Mentor Someone While the Hotel Is on Fire?

Mentorship in hospitality can disappear inside a very convincing promise: once things calm down, someone will have time to teach. The trouble is that a hotel has plenty of ways to keep things from calming down.

There is another arrival, another menu change, another vacancy and another manager covering a shift. The experienced person keeps solving the immediate problem. The new person learns enough to get through the day. Months later, leadership wonders why nobody is ready for the next role.

Some excellent mentors do this work every day. They deserve recognition and the conditions to keep doing it. I want to get deeper into the places where teaching survives mainly because somebody cares enough to squeeze it into a job that already takes too much.

A young cook, a new salesperson or a first-time supervisor should be able to build a future in hospitality. We make that difficult when their development depends on finding a generous person who has no time left.

Mentorship in hospitality needs time the roster can support

Imagine an experienced banquet captain training a new colleague while also covering an empty position. They explain the setup, answer radio calls, fix a timing problem and try to keep the event moving. That is an illustrative situation, but the planning question is concrete: what time did the hotel actually give them to teach?

A name beside “mentor” in an onboarding document does not answer it. Someone needs enough overlap to demonstrate the work, explain the judgment behind it, watch a person try and talk through what happened.

That time has to be paid and included in the workload. If the mentor’s own targets stay untouched while training gets added, the hotel has handed them another responsibility and called it an opportunity.

Teaching may mean the experienced person does less production work for part of a shift. A GM who approves that trade has to defend it when someone asks why the labor line moved. Otherwise, the next busy weekend can quietly erase the arrangement.

Being good at a job does not explain how to teach it

A skilled employee can perform a task so naturally that they no longer notice the decisions inside it. When a beginner struggles, the expert may become frustrated with something that feels obvious. Leaders should help the expert break the work into steps and give useful feedback.

New managers need coaching, too. Promoting someone because they can handle the busiest shift does not prepare them to handle conflict, develop a colleague or address a mistake without embarrassing them. Those responsibilities deserve deliberate practice.

There is also a harder possibility: someone may keep knowledge close because being the only person who understands the system feels like protection. If the hotel rewards indispensability, sharing expertise can feel risky. Leadership needs to make developing another capable person a sign of success.

And when the learner becomes ready to move, let the mentor be proud of it. Punishing a department for producing someone another department wants is a good way to teach managers to stop developing people.

Who gets access to mentorship in hospitality?

Look beyond the colleague who reminds a manager of themselves. Who gets invited to shadow a meeting? Who gets an explanation after a difficult decision? Who is trusted to practice, and who keeps hearing that they need more experience without being offered a way to gain it?

Kate Dashper’s 2020 research on mentoring women in hospitality followed a UK program over a year and documented persistent gendered career barriers. That specific study gives hotels a reason to examine access to support, rather than assume everybody can reach the same opportunities.

At your property, the question should include people on other shifts, colleagues whose first language differs from management’s, and employees who cannot stay late to become visible. Offer ways to learn that fit within the working time the hotel actually pays for.

Mentoring also needs somewhere to go. A supportive conversation can be valuable, but leadership should be clear about the next skill, the next opportunity and who can authorize it. Encouragement becomes frustrating when nobody is willing to open a door.

Give teaching somewhere to survive

Choose one developing employee and one experienced colleague. Agree on a skill to learn, put the overlap on the roster and make room in the mentor’s work. Ask both people whether the time happened and whether it helped. A completed form is a weak substitute for that conversation.

Then review how you evaluate the managers involved. Can someone protect training time, share their knowledge and support a promotion without being penalized for the short-term disruption? That decision belongs with the people setting targets and approving resources.

I care about mentorship in hospitality because this industry helped make me. I want the next person to inherit the judgment and generosity that let good hospitality grow. We cannot keep asking experienced people to carry that inheritance in whatever minutes are left over.

If development disappears every time service gets busy, leadership needs to explain when it expects the next generation to be built.

Continue the conversation in Hospitality Field Notes. For practical references across the operation, visit Hospitality Intelligence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *